Skip to content
Ranking10 AI assistantsScores as of 11 November 2026

Environmental ranking of AI assistants

Gemini has the highest environment score, 73 out of 100, ahead of Vibe (72) and Copilot (53). Frugality of the assistant in everyday use. 4 criteria scored from 0 to 3, scaled to 100 and weighted: a high score signals a frugal assistant.

Environment score of the 10 AI assistants, out of 100

Environment score out of 100, 4 weighted criteria; data as of 5 November 2026

  1. 1GeminiGoogle · United States7383506783
  2. 2VibeMistral AI · France7267757575
  3. 3CopilotMicrosoft · United States5358335067
  4. 4ClaudeAnthropic · United States4750673333
  5. 5DeepSeekDeepSeek · China4558581733
  6. 6PerplexityPerplexity · United States4250583317
  7. 7ChatGPTOpenAI · United States4050333333
  8. 8Meta AIMeta · United States3750171750
  9. 9QwenAlibaba · China3333173350
  10. 10GrokSpaceX Super Intelligence · United States1333000

Simple query, Advanced queries, Electricity, Approach: the detail is in the Table tab.

Sources for each score: Projet Celsius research of 4/11/2026, company publications, press, Stanford transparency index. CC BY 4.0 licence.

AI Impact, by Projet Celsius

Criteria detail

Criterion40 %

Simple query

Consumption of a typical text query, on the default model served: figure published by the company, third-party estimate, failing that the size of the model.

  1. Gemini830.24 Wh and 0.26 mL of water measured by Google for the median text query of the Gemini app (May 2025), without naming the model.
  2. Vibe67Fast mode by default, reasoning on demand; 1.14 g CO₂e per half-page response (LCA, 2025).
  3. Copilot58Serves OpenAI models, unspecified; no figure for Copilot (the 0.31 Wh from Microsoft Research, in Joule in April 2026, apply to a frontier AI in general).
  4. DeepSeek58Very sparse models (13 billion active parameters for Flash) and shortened responses in October 2026; reasoning by default in the API.
  5. Claude50Default Sonnet: 0.83 Wh per typical conversation according to CLEER (Sonnet 5), against 0.50 Wh for Gemini 3.7 Flash; Haiku, 0.08 Wh, remains available.
  6. Perplexity50Each question triggers a web search and the reading of pages; model chosen without being shown (often Sonar, medium size).
  7. ChatGPT50Free: GPT-6 Luna, a small model; paid: Sol; all reason. Low-confidence CLEER estimates for their predecessors GPT-5.6: 0.17 and 1.36 Wh.
  8. Meta AI50Muse Spark announces 10 times less compute than Llama 4 Maverick (April 2026), with no energy figure; estimate: medium level.
  9. Qwen33Very large flagship models (Qwen3.8, 2,400 billion parameters, class F at compar:IA); the app's default model is not published.
  10. Grok33No figure published or estimated by a third party; an opaque Auto mode chooses the model that answers, and Grok 4.7, the frontier model, is offered as an option (Expert and Heavy modes).

Our view

Environment, one paragraph per assistant

Gemini. Of the 3 companies that publish a per-query figure, Google is the only one to publish the details of its measurement method: 0.24 Wh and 0.26 mL of water for the median text query of the Gemini app, measured in May 2025; Google does not say which model serves it. It announces 33 times less energy per query in one year and 65% carbon-free electricity hour by hour. Heavy uses are growing: video, Deep Research, 5 billion images in one month, and group emissions up 81% since 2019.

73out of 1001st out of 10

"Rankings" series on the Éclairages blog

All articles on AI →

Continue in the ranking

The full ranking →

The hub newsletter

This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues

Projet Celsius, environmental strategy consultancy

We support companies that account for AI in their Bilan Carbone®

Visiter Projet Celsius ↗