Skip to content
Assistantlaunched in December 2022

Perplexity

Perplexity ↗ · United States
36out of 100Celsius score, 8th of 10

Identity card

The company

Founded
2022
Head office
San Francisco, California, United States
Chief executive
Aravind Srinivas

The product

Flagship model
Sonar
Subscription
€22 per month · Pro, on the App Store
API
0.25 $ / 2.50 $ input / output, per million tokens

The data

Law
United States

Usage

Web traffic, Sept. 2026
0.9 %

Key points

Perplexity is an answer engine: each answer links to the pages read, which makes it a popular tool for documentary research. The reliability of these answers remains uneven, and several major media outlets are suing the company for reusing their articles.

Good for
  • Search with sources
  • Monitoring
Less suited to
  • Long-form writing
  • Believing the news without checking
Share of web traffic to AI sites, August 2025 to September 2026
0.9 %7th of 7 assistants measured, September 2026 ; -1.6 points since Oct. 2025

Source: Similarweb, share of visits to generative AI sites, worldwide; records published by Similarweb and repeated by the press.

Our recommendation

Yes for looking up information and seeing where it comes from. Look elsewhere for writing, analysing a long document or coding (Claude, ChatGPT).

Strengths

Weak points

The company Perplexity

The Perplexity entry →

Company history

Perplexity was founded in San Francisco in August 2022 by Aravind Srinivas, Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho and Andy Konwinski. Their idea: replace a search engine's page of links with a written, sourced answer.

The story continues

The engine opens in December 2022. Perplexity relies on other companies' models and on its own, launches the Comet browser in 2025 and in August 2025 offers to buy Chrome for 34.5 billion dollars, an offer that went nowhere.

Its valuation reaches 20 billion dollars in September 2025, while media lawsuits multiply.

Sources: Wikipedia, 7 November 2026 ↗ ; Seeking Alpha, citing The Information, 10 September 2025 ↗

Key dates

  1. 22 August 2022Founded in San Francisco↗
  2. 7 December 2022Launch of the answer engine↗
  3. July 2025Launch of the Comet browser↗
  4. 12 August 202534.5 billion dollar offer for Chrome↗
  5. 5 December 2025Sued by the New York Times↗
  6. 28 May 2026Sued by CNN↗

Leadership

Chief executive officer and co-founder
Aravind Srinivas ↗
Co-founders
Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, Andy Konwinski ↗

Key figures

Valuation, September 2025
20 billion dollarsSeeking Alpha, citing The Information, 10 September 2025 ↗

Perplexity plans

Monthly price of Perplexity plansIn France, incl. VAT, € per monthThe subscription compared in the rankingIn grey: in the United States, excl. tax
  1. FreeFree0 €0 $
  2. ProStandard22 €20 $
  3. MaxPremiumprice published in dollars only200 $no euro price
  4. Enterprise ProEnterprise, per seatprice published in dollars only40 $no euro price

Perplexity pricing pages: including VAT in France, excluding tax in the United States; up to date as at 9 November 2026.

Content of the 4 plans, prices in France and the United States
FreeFreeA limited number of sourced searchesIn France, incl. VAT0 €In the United States, excl. tax0 $
StandardProMore in-depth research and a choice of modelIn France, incl. VAT22 €In the United States, excl. tax$20 ($17 per year)
PremiumMaxThe most powerful models and 10,000 agent credits per monthIn France, incl. VATnot publishedIn the United States, excl. tax$200 ($167 per year)
CompanyEnterprise ProFor companies; data is never used for trainingIn France, incl. VATnot publishedIn the United States, excl. tax$40 per seat ($34 annually)

Prices in France and the United States. In the United States, prices are shown in dollars and excluding tax; in France, they include 20% VAT. So $20 does not equal €20: the French price is often slightly higher. When only the dollar price appears, the company does not publish a euro price: the amount paid in France depends on the exchange rate and VAT.

API price of the flagship model of the 9 assistants that have oneOutput price, $ per million tokensPerplexityIn grey: input price
  1. VibeMistral Large1.50 $0.50 $
  2. PerplexitySonar2.50 $0.25 $1.7 times the output price of Vibe
  3. DeepSeekV4-Pro3.96 $1.32 $
  4. Meta AIMuse Spark 1.14.25 $1.25 $
  5. QwenQwen3.8-Max6 $2 $
  6. GrokGrok 4.76 $2 $
  7. GeminiGemini 4 Argon10 $2 $
  8. ClaudeOpus 5.520 $4 $
  9. ChatGPTGPT-6 Astra50 $10 $

Copilot: no API of its own. Flagship model of each company, standard rate, up to date as of 9 November 2026.

Prices up to date as of 9 November 2026, read on the companies' pages, or from 2 concordant sources; the date of each record is in the page's price file Methodology.

Perplexity models

Company
Perplexity
Models offered
"Best" (automatic model choice)by default, Free and paid plans (official page ↗)GPT-6.1 Solpaid plan, Pro, Max; 3rd of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)GPT-6 Astrapaid plan, Max; 2nd of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Gemini 4 Argonpaid plan, Max; 7th of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Gemini 3.8 Flashpaid plan, Pro, Max; 22nd of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Claude Sonnet 5.5paid plan, Pro, Max; 8th of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Claude Opus 5.5paid plan, Max; 4th of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Claude Fable 5.1paid plan, Max; 6th of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Grok 4.7paid plan, Pro, Max; 36th of 71 for general intelligence (official page ↗)Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI), GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (NVIDIA)paid plan, Pro, Max (official page ↗)

Links read on 10/11/2026 on the company's pages, press as a fallback. Rank: Epoch AI ECI index (CC BY 4.0). Performance of AI models

Data management

How Perplexity handles conversations

Score on this criterion: 33 out of 100, joint 4th out of 10. Retention for AI active by default, can be turned off; stated period contradictory; no procedure in Europe. The ethics ranking

Environment

Environment score

42 6th of 10
  • Simple query 40 %50
  • Advanced queries 20 %58
  • Decarbonised electricity 20 %33
  • Environmental approach 20 %17

Black line: average of the 10. The environmental ranking

Our view

Each query to Perplexity launches a web search and the reading of several pages, with a model chosen without being displayed, often Sonar, of medium size. Heavy uses remain limited: no image or video highlighted, but Deep Research and the Comet agent browser. Perplexity rents its servers from AWS and Azure without publishing the countries or the electricity, and publishes no figure and no report.

Per-query figure published by Perplexity

Nothing published

Perplexity publishes no per-query figure, either for energy or for emissions. 3 of 10 companies publish one: Google, Mistral AI and OpenAI.

Company figures cannot be compared with each other: scopes and methods differ. The "Simple query" criterion of the environmental ranking combines them with external estimates, for lack of a common basis: the methodology sets out the limits.

  • Gemini0.24 Wh
  • Copilotnothing published
  • Vibe1.14 gCO2e
  • Claudenothing published
  • ChatGPT0.34 Wh
  • Qwennothing published
  • Meta AInothing published
  • Perplexitynothing published
  • DeepSeeknothing published
  • Groknothing published

On the Éclairages blog: What is the electricity consumption of AI? ↗ ; Which AIs pollute the most? ↗

Scores and criteria

The ranking →

The Celsius score is the average of 3 scores: performance, ethics and environment. Each combines several criteria. Each row places Perplexity among the 10; clicking a criterion opens its definition and the justification for Perplexity's score.

Dots: the 9 other assistants; grey line: average of the 10The methodology
Celsius score 368th of 10
Performance 1/3289th of 10
5 public rankings 100 %289th of 10

Definition. Synthesis of 5 public performance rankings, where models are ranked by tests or by votes from internet users: each ranking gives 100 to the best of the 10 and 0 to the last.

Justification. No model of its own: estimate, average of its 2 neighbours in the ranking, Grok and Vibe.

Ethics 1/3396th of 10
Content produced 30 %58joint 4th out of 10

Definition. Content the assistant produces on request (sexual, misleading images, minors) and results of independent tests.

Justification. Pornography prohibited, no known sexual incident; no deepfake rules and no age verification; 47% false claims (NewsGuard, 8/2025).

Use of data 30 %33joint 4th out of 10

Definition. Use of conversations for training, retention period, storage location, sanctions by the authorities.

Justification. Retention for AI active by default, can be turned off; stated period contradictory; no procedure in Europe.

Safety 20 %257th out of 10

Definition. Independent safety evaluations (Future of Life Institute, SaferAI, Phare) and resistance to attacks.

Justification. No safety framework, no Seoul commitments, no European code; absent from independent evaluations.

Governance 20 %33joint 5th out of 10

Definition. Control of the company and deliberate choices: military uses, shareholding, commitments kept or abandoned.

Justification. Serves other companies' models; sued by at least 6 media outlets and platforms, accused by Cloudflare of getting around blocks (8/2025).

Environment 1/3426th of 10
Simple query 40 %50joint 5th out of 10

Definition. Consumption of a typical text query, on the default model served: figure published by the company, third-party estimate, failing that the size of the model.

Justification. Each question triggers a web search and the reading of pages; model chosen without being shown (often Sonar, medium size).

Advanced queries 20 %58joint 3rd out of 10

Definition. Weight of the resource-hungry uses the product promotes: video and image generation, agents, reasoning enabled by default.

Justification. Deep Research and the Comet agent browser; no image or video highlighted.

Decarbonised electricity 20 %33joint 4th out of 10

Definition. Share of low-carbon electricity in the data centres and efforts to increase it: local grid, on-site gas, renewable or nuclear electricity contracts.

Justification. Rented clouds (AWS, Azure), countries and electricity not published.

Environmental approach 20 %179th of 10

Definition. What the company publishes and commits to: energy and emissions figures, environmental report, targets, model optimisation.

Justification. No figure, no report, no published optimisation.

Compare

Other comparisons

Celsius score gap.

Ranked 8th of 10 in the assistant ranking, scores as at 11 November 2026. Facts and figures in the entry collected from 7 to 9/11/2026, each with its source; foundation and headquarters: Perplexity AI, Form D (SEC, 5/4/2023), 11 November 2026 ↗.

Continue in the ranking

The full ranking →

The hub newsletter

This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues

Projet Celsius, environmental strategy consultancy

We support companies that account for AI in their Bilan Carbone®

Visiter Projet Celsius ↗