Qwen or Perplexity
Qwen is ahead of Perplexity on the Celsius score: 39 against 36 out of 100. Qwen is ahead on performance, Perplexity on ethics and environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance49280out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of Perplexity on performance: 49 against 28 out of 100.
- Ethics34390out of 100100
Perplexity is ahead of Qwen on ethics: 39 against 34 out of 100. Largest gap: "Generated content", Perplexity 58 against 50.
- Environment33420out of 100100
Perplexity is ahead of Qwen on environment: 42 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", Perplexity 58 against 17.
- Use0.9 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 0.9% for Perplexity; not measured for Qwen in our dataset.
- Price6 $2.50 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
The Perplexity API costs 2.4 times less for output: $2.50 against $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (Qwen) and €22 (Perplexity).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantPerplexity36out of 100, 8th out of 10The Perplexity entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsQwen or Meta AI39 against 48Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
