Skip to content
Comparison2 AI assistants

Gemini or Qwen

Gemini is ahead of Qwen on Celsius score: 71 against 39 out of 100. Gemini is ahead on performance, ethics and environment.

GeminiGoogle ↗71-39Celsius score out of 100QwenAlibaba ↗
First assistant
ClaudeGeminiChatGPTCopilotMeta AIVibeQwenPerplexityDeepSeekGrok
Second assistant
ClaudeGeminiChatGPTCopilotMeta AIVibeQwenPerplexityDeepSeekGrok

Gaps by category

  1. Performance94490out of 100100

    Gemini is ahead of Qwen on performance: 94 against 49 out of 100.

  2. Ethics46340out of 100100

    Gemini is ahead of Qwen on ethics: 46 against 34 out of 100. Largest gap: "Safety", Gemini 58 against 33.

  3. Environment73330out of 100100

    Gemini is ahead of Qwen on environment: 73 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Simple query", Gemini 83 against 33.

  4. Use25.0 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60

    Web traffic: 25.0% for Gemini; not measured for Qwen in our data. Among developers (OpenRouter): 14.4% for Gemini, 5.6% for Qwen.

  5. Price10 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50

    Qwen's API costs 1.7 times less for output: $6 against $10 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €21.99 (Gemini) and free (Qwen).

Continue in the ranking

The full ranking →

The hub newsletter

This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues

Projet Celsius, environmental strategy consultancy

We support companies that account for AI in their Bilan Carbone®

Visiter Projet Celsius ↗