Qwen or DeepSeek
Qwen is ahead of DeepSeek on the Celsius score: 39 against 35 out of 100. Qwen is ahead on performance and ethics, DeepSeek on environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance49430out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of DeepSeek on performance: 49 against 43 out of 100.
- Ethics34180out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of DeepSeek on ethics: 34 against 18 out of 100. Largest gap: "Safety", Qwen 33 against 8.
- Environment33450out of 100100
DeepSeek is ahead of Qwen on environment: 45 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", DeepSeek 58 against 17.
- Use3.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 3.4% for DeepSeek; not measured for Qwen in our dataset. Among developers (OpenRouter): 5.6% for Qwen, 29.8% for DeepSeek.
- Price6 $3.96 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
The DeepSeek API costs 1.5 times less for output: $3.96 against $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (Qwen) and free (DeepSeek).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantDeepSeek35out of 100, 9th out of 10The DeepSeek entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsQwen or Meta AI39 against 48Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
