Vibe or Qwen
Celsius score: Vibe 40, Qwen 39 out of 100, 1 point apart; the method does not treat a gap of less than 3 points as significant. Vibe is ahead on ethics and environment, Qwen on performance.
Gaps by category
- Performance7490out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of Vibe on performance: 49 against 7 out of 100.
- Ethics41340out of 100100
Vibe is ahead of Qwen on ethics: 41 against 34 out of 100. Largest gap: "Data use", Vibe 58 against 25.
- Environment72330out of 100100
Vibe is ahead of Qwen on environment: 72 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", Vibe 75 against 17.
- Use0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic not measured for either assistant in our dataset. Among developers (OpenRouter): 2.2% for Vibe, 5.6% for Qwen.
- Price1.50 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
The Vibe API costs 4 times less for output: $1.50 against $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €17.99 (Vibe) and free (Qwen).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantVibe40out of 100, 6th out of 10The Vibe entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsVibe or Meta AI40 against 48Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
