ChatGPT or Qwen
ChatGPT is ahead of Qwen on Celsius score: 62 against 39 out of 100. ChatGPT is ahead on performance, ethics and environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance93490out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Qwen on performance: 93 against 49 out of 100.
- Ethics52340out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Qwen on ethics: 52 against 34 out of 100. Largest gap: "Safety", ChatGPT 67 against 33.
- Environment40330out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Qwen on environment: 40 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Simple query", ChatGPT 50 against 33.
- Use56.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 56.4% for ChatGPT; not measured for Qwen in our data. Among developers (OpenRouter): 18.8% for ChatGPT, 5.6% for Qwen.
- Price50 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
Qwen's API costs 8.3 times less for output: $6 against $50 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €22.99 (ChatGPT) and free (Qwen).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantChatGPT62out of 100, 3rd out of 10The ChatGPT entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsChatGPT or Gemini62 against 71Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
