ChatGPT or DeepSeek
ChatGPT is ahead of DeepSeek on Celsius score: 62 against 35 out of 100. ChatGPT is ahead on performance and ethics, DeepSeek on environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance93430out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of DeepSeek on performance: 93 against 43 out of 100.
- Ethics52180out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of DeepSeek on ethics: 52 against 18 out of 100. Largest gap: "Safety", ChatGPT 67 against 8.
- Environment40450out of 100100
DeepSeek is ahead of ChatGPT on environment: 45 against 40 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", DeepSeek 58 against 33.
- Use56.4 %3.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
ChatGPT has 16.6 times more web traffic than DeepSeek: 56.4% against 3.4% of visits to AI sites. Among developers (OpenRouter): 18.8% for ChatGPT, 29.8% for DeepSeek.
- Price50 $3.96 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
DeepSeek's API costs 12.6 times less for output: $3.96 against $50 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €22.99 (ChatGPT) and free (DeepSeek).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantChatGPT62out of 100, 3rd out of 10The ChatGPT entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantDeepSeek35out of 100, 9th out of 10The DeepSeek entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsChatGPT or Gemini62 against 71Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
