DeepSeek or Grok
DeepSeek is ahead of Grok on the Celsius score: 35 against 26 out of 100. DeepSeek is ahead on environment, Grok on performance, with a gap of less than 3 points on ethics.
Gaps by category
- Performance43490out of 100100
Grok is ahead of DeepSeek on performance: 49 against 43 out of 100.
- Ethics18170out of 100100
Ethics score: DeepSeek 18, Grok 17 out of 100, 1 point apart; the method does not treat a gap of less than 3 points as significant. Largest gap: "Generated content", DeepSeek 33 against 17.
- Environment45130out of 100100
DeepSeek is ahead of Grok on environment: 45 against 13 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", DeepSeek 58 against 0.
- Use3.4 %2.3 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
DeepSeek has 1.5 times more web traffic than Grok: 3.4% against 2.3% of visits to AI sites.
- Price3.96 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
The DeepSeek API costs 1.5 times less for output: $3.96 against $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (DeepSeek) and $30 (Grok).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantDeepSeek35out of 100, 9th out of 10The DeepSeek entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantGrok26out of 100, 10th out of 10The Grok entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsDeepSeek or Vibe35 against 40Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
