Meta AI or DeepSeek
Meta AI is ahead of DeepSeek on Celsius score: 48 against 35 out of 100. Meta AI is ahead on performance and ethics, DeepSeek on environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance77430out of 100100
Meta AI is ahead of DeepSeek on performance: 77 against 43 out of 100.
- Ethics31180out of 100100
Meta AI is ahead of DeepSeek on ethics: 31 against 18 out of 100. Largest gap: "Safety", Meta AI 42 against 8.
- Environment37450out of 100100
DeepSeek is ahead of Meta AI on environment: 45 against 37 out of 100. Largest gap: "Advanced queries", DeepSeek 58 against 17.
- Use3.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 3.4% for DeepSeek; not measured for Meta AI in our data. Among developers (OpenRouter): 1.5% for Meta AI, 29.8% for DeepSeek.
- Price4.25 $3.96 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
DeepSeek's API costs 1.1 times less for output: $3.96 against $4.25 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (Meta AI) and free (DeepSeek).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantMeta AI48out of 100, 5th out of 10The Meta AI entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantDeepSeek35out of 100, 9th out of 10The DeepSeek entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsMeta AI or Copilot48 against 58Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
