ChatGPT or Meta AI
ChatGPT is ahead of Meta AI on Celsius score: 62 against 48 out of 100. ChatGPT is ahead on performance, ethics and environment.
Gaps by category
- Performance93770out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Meta AI on performance: 93 against 77 out of 100.
- Ethics52310out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Meta AI on ethics: 52 against 31 out of 100. Largest gap: "Content produced", ChatGPT 67 against 33.
- Environment40370out of 100100
ChatGPT is ahead of Meta AI on environment: 40 against 37 out of 100. Largest gap: "Environmental approach", Meta AI 50 against 33.
- Use56.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 56.4% for ChatGPT; not measured for Meta AI in our data. Among developers (OpenRouter): 18.8% for ChatGPT, 1.5% for Meta AI.
- Price50 $4.25 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
Meta AI's API costs 11.8 times less for output: $4.25 against $50 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €22.99 (ChatGPT) and free (Meta AI).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantChatGPT62out of 100, 3rd out of 10The ChatGPT entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantMeta AI48out of 100, 5th out of 10The Meta AI entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsChatGPT or Gemini62 against 71Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
