Meta AI or Qwen
Meta AI is ahead of Qwen on Celsius score: 48 against 39 out of 100. Meta AI is ahead on performance and environment, Qwen on ethics.
Gaps by category
- Performance77490out of 100100
Meta AI is ahead of Qwen on performance: 77 against 49 out of 100.
- Ethics31340out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of Meta AI on ethics: 34 against 31 out of 100. Largest gap: "Content produced", Qwen 50 against 33.
- Environment37330out of 100100
Meta AI is ahead of Qwen on environment: 37 against 33 out of 100. Largest gap: "Simple query", Meta AI 50 against 33.
- Use0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic not measured for either assistant in our data. Among developers (OpenRouter): 1.5% for Meta AI, 5.6% for Qwen.
- Price4.25 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
Meta AI's API costs 1.4 times less for output: $4.25 against $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (Meta AI) and free (Qwen).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantMeta AI48out of 100, 5th out of 10The Meta AI entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsMeta AI or Copilot48 against 58Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
