Comparison2 AI assistants
Qwen or Grok
Qwen is ahead of Grok on the Celsius score: 39 against 26 out of 100. Qwen is ahead on ethics and environment, with a gap of less than 3 points on performance.
First assistant
Second assistant
Gaps by category
- Performance49490out of 100100
Performance score: 49 out of 100 for both Qwen and Grok.
- Ethics34170out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of Grok on ethics: 34 against 17 out of 100. Largest gap: "Generated content", Qwen 50 against 17.
- Environment33130out of 100100
Qwen is ahead of Grok on environment: 33 against 13 out of 100. Largest gap: "Environmental approach", Qwen 50 against 0.
- Use2.3 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60
Web traffic: 2.3% for Grok; not measured for Qwen in our dataset.
- Price6 $6 $0$ per million output tokens, API50
Same output price: $6 per million tokens. Subscriptions: free (Qwen) and $30 (Grok).
Continue in the ranking
The full ranking →AssistantQwen39out of 100, 7th out of 10The Qwen entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →AssistantGrok26out of 100, 10th out of 10The Grok entry: scores, plans, models, data.The entry →Comparison2 AI assistantsQwen or Meta AI39 against 48Celsius score out of 100Another comparison, with an assistant close in the ranking.The comparison →The hub newsletter
This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues
