Skip to content
Comparison2 AI assistants

Gemini or ChatGPT

Gemini is ahead of ChatGPT on Celsius score: 71 against 62 out of 100. Gemini is ahead on environment, ChatGPT on ethics, with a gap of less than 3 points on performance.

GeminiGoogle ↗71-62Celsius score out of 100ChatGPTOpenAI ↗
First assistant
ClaudeGeminiChatGPTCopilotMeta AIVibeQwenPerplexityDeepSeekGrok
Second assistant
ClaudeGeminiChatGPTCopilotMeta AIVibeQwenPerplexityDeepSeekGrok

Gaps by category

  1. Performance94930out of 100100

    Performance score: Gemini 94, ChatGPT 93 out of 100, a gap of 1 point; the method does not treat a gap of less than 3 points as significant.

  2. Ethics46520out of 100100

    ChatGPT is ahead of Gemini on ethics: 52 against 46 out of 100. Largest gap: "Content produced", ChatGPT 67 against 58.

  3. Environment73400out of 100100

    Gemini is ahead of ChatGPT on environment: 73 against 40 out of 100. Largest gap: "Environmental approach", Gemini 83 against 33.

  4. Use25.0 %56.4 %0% of AI sites' web traffic60

    ChatGPT has 2.3 times more web traffic than Gemini: 56.4% against 25.0% of visits to AI sites. Among developers (OpenRouter): 14.4% for Gemini, 18.8% for ChatGPT.

  5. Price10 $50 $0$ per million output tokens, API50

    Gemini's API costs 5 times less for output: $10 against $50 per million tokens. Subscriptions: €21.99 (Gemini) and €22.99 (ChatGPT).

Continue in the ranking

The full ranking →

The hub newsletter

This month's ranking, news on the impact of AI and one figure from the AI Impact Database. One newsletter a month at most, free of charge. Past issues

Projet Celsius, environmental strategy consultancy

We support companies that account for AI in their Bilan Carbone®

Visiter Projet Celsius ↗