Skip to content
AnalysisElectricity13 November 2026

Is AI reviving gas, or financing low-carbon electricity?

Electricity contracts and projects of data centres by source, region and date of entry into service

Guillaume PakulaClément ReynaudSébastien PierfedericiAlexandre Veilly By Projet Celsius
Published on 13 November 2026 · 12 min read
Stacks and boilers of a combined-cycle gas power plant in the United States, behind a fence, under a cloudy sky

Combined-cycle gas power plant, North Carolina (United States). Photo Peoplepoweredbyenergy, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The 2 trends are both under way, in different regions. In the United States, gas is the main source added for data centres by 2030 according to the International Energy Agency, and 210 GW of on-site gas plants are planned, 17 of them under construction; in Europe, renewables and nuclear would supply 85% in 2030. The low-carbon contracts of the large operators are numerous, but many cover existing plants or come into service from 2027, and they are counted over the year rather than hour by hour.

Contents

In September 2024, Microsoft signs for 20 years the electricity of a Three Mile Island reactor that its operator is going to restart. In August 2025, the Louisiana energy commission approves 3 gas plants to supply Meta's campus at Richland Parish. Each of these 2 announcements serves as an example for an opposing thesis: AI would finance nuclear and renewables, or it would revive gas.

Our analysis on the electricity shortage recalls the global assessment of the International Energy Agency (IEA) for 2030, about 340 TWh of gas for data centres and 360 of renewables, to which nearly 120 TWh of nuclear is added. Here we look at where each addition takes place, at what time, and what the announced contracts really bring.

1.

Sources added by 2030, by region

The IEA details where the additional electricity for data centres will come from between 2024 and 2030. In the United States, where gas already supplies more than 40% of their electricity, it is the main source added, with more than 130 TWh, ahead of renewables, 110 TWh. In China, where coal supplies about 70%, coal and renewables each add about 90 TWh. In Europe, renewables and nuclear are to supply most of the addition, and 85% of data centre electricity in 2030.

Electricity added for data centres between 2024 and 2030, by source, in TWh (IEA projection, base case):

United States, gasmore than 130 TWhUnited States, renewables110 TWhChina, coalabout 90 TWhChina, renewablesabout 90 TWh

The gap comes down to the starting grid and to lead times. A reactor or a high-voltage line is counted in years; in the large European hubs, connecting a data centre takes 7 to 10 years on average according to the think tank Ember. Where the grid does not keep up, the operator generates on site. In October 2026, the IEA lists about 210 GW of gas plants planned to supply data centres directly, 190 GW of them at the proposal stage and 17 GW under construction, more than 95% in the United States. The IEA estimates that about 15 to 27 GW of on-site gas could supply data centres in 2030, and doubts that this route is faster at scale, for lack of turbines.

2.

New production from the announced contracts, and date of entry into service

For the climate, a low-carbon contract counts through the new production it brings into being. A restarted reactor or a new reactor adds some; a contract on an existing plant that was already producing for the grid takes the same amount away from other consumers, unless it prevents its closure. The operators' large nuclear contracts fall into these 3 cases.

Contract or projectSourcePowerNew productionEntry into service
Microsoft and Constellation, Three Mile Island 1 (Pennsylvania)Nuclear835 MWYes, restart of a shut-down reactor2027 targeted
Google and NextEra, Duane Arnold (Iowa)Nuclear615 MWYes, restart of a shut-down reactorTarget start of 2029
Meta and Constellation, Clinton (Illinois)Nuclear1,121 MWIn part: 30 MW of uprate; according to Constellation, the contract avoids closure after 2027June 2027
Amazon and Talen, Susquehanna (Pennsylvania)Nuclear1,920 MWNo, existing production (uprates are under study)Gradual ramp-up until 2032
Google and Kairos PowerSmall reactorsUp to 500 MWYes, new reactorsFirst reactor around 2030
Meta and Entergy, Richland Parish (Louisiana)Gas3 combined-cycle plantsYes, new plants connected to the gridApproved in August 2025
Microsoft and Chevron, TexasOn-site gas2.67 GWYes, new plant behind the meter, off grid2028 targeted, investment decision expected at the end of 2026
xAI, Memphis (Tennessee)Gas, on-site turbines247 MW, 15 turbinesYes, on-site turbines, off gridAuthorised in July 2025
Crusoe, Abilene (Texas)Gas, on-site turbinesNearly 1 GW, 29 turbinesYes, on-site turbines, off gridOrdered in 2024 and 2025
Data4 and EDF (France)Nuclear40 MW, about 230 GWh a yearNo, part of the existing fleetDeliveries from 2026

Contracts and projects read in company press releases, regulators' decisions or the secondary reports cited in the margin, as at 13 November 2026. Capacities announced or contracted, none measured.

Of the 5 American nuclear contracts in the table, 3 add new production, 1 keeps running a plant that its operator said was threatened with closure, 1 concerns existing production; none delivers before 2027. Small reactors illustrate the gap between announcement and production: the IEA counts about 45 GW of agreements with data centres at the end of 2025, memoranda of understanding and letters of intent, for first projects expected around 2030. On-site turbines are already running, in Memphis since 2025; but delivery times for large turbines reach 5 years or more according to the IEA.

3.

Renewable electricity purchases are counted over the year

Purchases of low-carbon electricity by contract are massive. Companies announced 55.9 GW of clean electricity contracts in 2025 according to BloombergNEF, of which 49% by Meta, Amazon, Google and Microsoft. Google says it signed more than 12 GW of new clean electricity in 2025; Microsoft and Brookfield concluded a framework in 2024 for about 10.5 GW of new renewable capacity.

These contracts are counted over the year: Microsoft, Meta and Amazon say they cover 100% of their annual consumption with renewable electricity, without publishing, in their latest report, an hourly share for all of their consumption. Google is the only one of the 4 to publish this share: in 2025, carbon-free electricity covered about 65% of the consumption of its data centres and offices hour by hour, against 66% in 2024, despite consumption rising by 37%. The IEA sums it up: electricity bought by contract is often neither produced near the data centres nor when they need it, and the grid often covers it with other sources, such as gas or coal. Our chart of contracts and the grid shows this same gap in emissions, at Meta, Google and Microsoft.

4.

France, a special case

In France, the grid already supplies low-carbon electricity, and data centre contracts concern the existing fleet. Data4 is the first data centre operator in France to sign a nuclear production allocation contract with EDF: 40 MW for 12 years, about 230 GWh per year from 2026. This contract does not add any production; it fixes the price and the origin of a share of existing production. The French question concerns the grid and its grid connections, which is addressed by our viewpoint on hosting data centres.

5.

Our reading

At Projet Celsius, we think the question has no global answer. In the United States, where power is needed quickly and the grid cannot always keep up, the growth of data centres increases gas, through new plants and on-site turbines, almost as much as it increases renewables; in Europe, the added electricity comes mainly from renewables and nuclear, and in France from a fleet that is already low-carbon. The low-carbon contracts announced in the United States add production from 2027, and only in part. To judge an operator's commitment, 3 pieces of information matter: is the electricity new, when does it arrive, and what share of consumption does it cover hour by hour.

Point to note

The capacities in the table are announced or contracted; none is measured production. The IEA's projections by region date from April 2025 (base case); its October 2026 update raises the share of on-site gas. Several contracts are read in secondary reports (Duane Arnold, xAI); the capacity of the 3 Louisiana plants is not given in the commission's order.

Guillaume PakulaClément ReynaudSébastien PierfedericiAlexandre Veilly
By Projet CelsiusAI Impact, Projet Celsius · 13 November 2026
Write to us →

Sources

21 documents

Every figure was read in its source; the hub's methodology is described in Methodology and sources.

Cite this analysis

AI Impact, Projet Celsius, "Is AI reviving gas, or financing low-carbon electricity?", 13 November 2026. https://projetcelsius.com/en/ai/analyses/is-ai-reviving-gas-or-funding-low-carbon-power/

Charts and maps

A question about a figure?

An error, a source to add, a methodology question, a press request: write to us. Guillaume Pakula, Clément Reynaud, Sébastien Pierfederici and Alexandre Veilly will reply.

Write to us →

Projet Celsius, which runs this hub, also helps companies measure and reduce the footprint of their AI use.

Accounting for AI in your Bilan Carbone® ↗
Projet Celsius, environmental strategy consultancy

We support companies that account for AI in their Bilan Carbone®

Visit Projet Celsius ↗