- 1The TGV emits 50 to 80 times less than flying on domestic journeys.
- 2For journeys under 4 hours, the train is at least as fast door to door: airports and transfers add 2 to 3 hours to the flight.
- 3Flying remains artificially cheap: untaxed kerosene, no VAT on international flights, subsidised regional airports.
- 4Booking early often substantially reduces train fares, which rise as trains fill up.
A Paris-Marseille journey emits 2.4 kgCO2e by TGV, around 120 kgCO2e by car and around 150 kgCO2e by plane: the TGV emits 50 to 60 times less than its alternatives on this journey. France has one of the world's best high-speed networks, but trains retain an image of being slow and expensive, which the figures below help correct.
1Carbon comparison by journey
Here are the comparative emissions, for a one-way trip, on the main business routes from Paris. Source: ADEME's Base Empreinte.
Train or plane: emissions and door-to-door time by journey
One way, in kgCO2e per passenger. Door-to-door time (including check-in, security and airport transfers)
| Journey | TGV CO2e | TGV time | Plane CO2e | Plane time | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris-Lyon | 1.8 kg | 2h00 | 100 kg | 3h30 | ×55 |
| Paris-Marseille | 2.4 kg | 3h15 | 150 kg | 3h45 | ×60 |
| Paris-Bordeaux | 1.5 kg | 2h04 | 120 kg | 3h30 | ×80 |
| Paris-Strasbourg | 1.3 kg | 1h46 | 90 kg | 3h30 | ×70 |
| Paris-Brussels | 1.0 kg | 1h22 | 80 kg | 3h30 | ×80 |
| Paris-London | 4 kg | 2h15 | 120 kg | 4h15 | ×30 |
SNCF, ADEME Base Empreinte
- Paris-Lyon: 1.8 kgCO2e by TGV (2h), compared with 100 kgCO2e by plane (1h flight, plus 2h30 for the airport and transfers), a factor of 55
- Paris-Marseille: 2.4 kgCO2e by TGV (3h15), compared with 150 kgCO2e by plane (1h15 flight, plus 2h30 for the airport and transfers), a factor of 60
- Paris-Bordeaux: 1.5 kgCO2e by TGV (2h04), compared with 120 kgCO2e by plane (1h flight, plus 2h30 for the airport and transfers), a factor of 80
- Paris-Strasbourg: 1.3 kgCO2e by TGV (1h46), compared with 90 kgCO2e by plane (1h flight, plus 2h30 for the airport and transfers), a factor of 70
- Paris-Brussels: 1.0 kgCO2e by Eurostar (1h22), compared with 80 kgCO2e by plane (1h flight, plus 2h30 for the airport and transfers), a factor of 80
- Paris-London: 4 kgCO2e by Eurostar (2h15), compared with 80 kgCO2e by plane (1h15 flight, plus 3h for the airport and transfers), a factor of 20
2Why flying seems cheaper
A one-way Paris-Barcelona flight with a low-cost airline can cost €30, compared with €100 to €200 by train. The comparison is distorted by the tax advantages enjoyed by aviation:
Why flying seems cheaper: invisible subsidies
What each mode pays for, and what it does not pay for
DGAC; European Court of Auditors, review 01/2022 on energy taxation
- Kerosene is not taxed, under the international exemption arising from the Chicago Convention (1944)
- International airline tickets are exempt from VAT, while rail pays network access charges and taxes on electricity
- Regional airports are subsidised by local authorities, and the real cost of infrastructure is not reflected in the ticket
- Intra-European flights pay for their CO2 through the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS), with no free allowances since 2026, but long-haul flights departing from Europe are not covered
If flying paid its real cost (energy, infrastructure and climate effects), the price gap with rail would narrow substantially. In its 2022 analysis of energy taxation, the European Court of Auditors also notes kerosene's exemption, which the Commission proposed removing in 2021 for intra-European flights.
The price of an airline ticket does not reflect its cost: kerosene is not taxed, international tickets escape VAT and regional airports are subsidised.
3Rail yield management: understanding price differences
The same seat can cost €29 or €129 depending on the departure time and how full the train is. SNCF seeks to fill its trains, because a half-empty train consumes almost as much energy as a full one. Attracting flexible travellers to quieter trains with low prices, and leaving peak trains to travellers with limited flexibility at higher prices, makes economic and environmental sense.
In practice, booking predictable journeys early often makes travel cheaper, since prices rise as trains fill up. A corporate contract negotiated with SNCF can add discounts on public fares, depending on travel volume.
4Night trains for journeys of 4 to 8 hours
For journeys of 4 to 8 hours without a fast TGV alternative, the night train is an option, although services from Paris remain limited:

- Paris-Berlin, relaunched by European Sleeper on 26 March 2026: 3 return journeys per week via Brussels and Hamburg, arriving in the city centre in the morning
- Paris-Nice, Paris-Toulouse and Paris-Briançon, in couchettes, on SNCF's Intercités de nuit services
- Paris-Cerbère, as far as the Spanish border, in the absence of a direct night service to Barcelona
- Nightjet (ÖBB), Europe's most extensive network, no longer serves Paris since Paris-Vienna ended on 14 December 2025
- The French hotel-train project Midnight Trains was abandoned in 2024 for lack of funding
The economic calculation is often favourable: the additional cost of the night ticket is offset by saving a hotel night (€80 to €150), and the employee arrives rested in the city centre rather than at an airport on the outskirts.
5Building a train-first travel policy
Here are the rules we consistently recommend, and which the companies we support are increasingly adopting:
- Train by default for journeys under 4 hours (Paris-Lyon, Brussels, London, Strasbourg and Bordeaux), since flying saves no door-to-door time on these routes
- Night train between 4 and 8 hours, where a service exists and the journey can be planned
- Plane only beyond 8 hours or without a reasonable alternative, asking before booking whether the meeting really requires travelling in person
- A corporate contract negotiated with SNCF, with discounts on public fares that depend on travel volume
- Booking predictable journeys as early as possible, as SNCF fares rise when trains fill up
6Key takeaways
The TGV is one of the world's lowest-emitting modes of transport per passenger-kilometre. For journeys under 4 hours, it performs at least as well as flying in door-to-door time, with vastly lower emissions. A train-first policy is one of the simplest measures in an emissions reduction strategy.
- The TGV emits 50 to 80 times less than flying on domestic journeys
- For journeys under 4 hours, the train is at least as fast door to door, as checks and transfers add 2 hours or more to the flight
- Flying remains artificially cheap: untaxed kerosene, no VAT on international tickets, subsidised regional airports
- Booking early often substantially reduces train fares, which rise as trains fill up
- The night train saves a hotel night and allows you to arrive rested in the city centre, but services from Paris remain limited




