- 1Claude leads the Celsius ranking of AI assistants, with 74/100, ahead of Gemini and ChatGPT.
- 2Performance, ethics and environment each count for a third of the final score.
- 3Gemini is the most frugal AI, closely followed by Vibe, the French assistant from Mistral AI.
- 4Grok comes last, with the worst score of all on both ethics and environment.
The most widely cited AI rankings only score performance. Projet Celsius, a French consultancy in environmental strategy and AI ethics, adds ethics and environment, with equal weight, for the 10 best-known consumer assistants, from ChatGPT to Qwen.
1What are the best AI assistants in 2026?
Claude leads, ahead of Gemini and ChatGPT
An AI can be brilliant and behave badly, or frugal and not very capable: the best is the one that holds up on all 3 fronts at once. On that basis, Claude comes first with 74/100, ahead of Gemini (68) and ChatGPT (60).
The Celsius ranking 2026
The 10 assistants scored out of 100 on performance, ethics and environment, with equal weights. Tap a header to sort, a row to see the detail.
| Assistant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ClaudeAnthropic | 98 | 77 | 47 | 74 | |
| 2 | GeminiGoogle | 86 | 46 | 73 | 68 | |
| 3 | ChatGPTOpenAI | 90 | 52 | 40 | 60 | |
| 4 | CopilotMicrosoft | 57 | 58 | 53 | 56 | |
| 5 | Meta AIMeta | 68 | 31 | 37 | 45 | |
| 6 | VibeMistral AI | 15 | 41 | 72 | 43 | |
| 7 | Perplexity | 36 | 39 | 42 | 39 | |
| 8 | DeepSeek | 43 | 18 | 45 | 35 | |
| 8 | QwenAlibaba | 42 | 29 | 33 | 35 | |
| 10 | GrokxAI | 42 | 17 | 13 | 24 |
Outside the score: the best free version comes from Gemini, 10th on LMArena, and the most used AI is still ChatGPT, with 56% of web traffic to AI sites.
Sources: Projet Celsius rankings (environment, ethics); LMArena, 28/10/2026; Artificial Analysis, Epoch AI, compar:IA and ARC Prize, Nov. 2026; Similarweb, Sept. 2026. Projet Celsius, version of 05/11/2026.
Copilot, 4th with 56, is the most consistent: its 3 scores sit between 53 and 58. Vibe, the French assistant from Mistral AI long known as Le Chat, comes last on performance but climbs to 6th place thanks to its frugality. Grok brings up the rear at 24/100, with the worst score on both ethics and environment.
The planet weighs as much as performance
Each AI receives 3 scores out of 100, then a final score, their average with equal weights. In all 3, the higher the score, the better. The free version and audience size stay out of the score, as notes below the table:
- The performance score combines 5 public rankings (75%) and our own experience of use (25%).
- The ethics score is the one from our ranking of the most ethical AI assistants, covering what they agree to produce, your data, their safety and the company behind them.
- The environment score is the one from our ranking of the most polluting AI assistants, covering the model that answers, images and video, the electricity powering the servers and the developer's efforts.
2Which AI performs best?
Performance is what people compare first, and it is also what changes fastest. Our score combines 5 public rankings: 2 where users pick the better of 2 answers blind, LMArena and the French compar:IA, and 3 where every AI sits the same exams, those of Artificial Analysis, Epoch AI and ARC Prize.
On that basis, Claude is the best-performing AI, with 98/100, ahead of ChatGPT (90) and Gemini (86). Vibe, from Mistral AI, comes last at 15/100.
Progress is fast. The ARC-AGI-3 test is made of small logic games that are easy for a human. In March 2026, no AI solved more than 1% of them. By the end of October, the best, from OpenAI, solved nearly 2 in 3.

No AI wins everywhere
Claude wins only one of the 5 rankings, the French users' vote on compar:IA, but it is 2nd in all the others: its consistency gives it the best average. Gemini wins the worldwide vote on LMArena and the Artificial Analysis index, ChatGPT the hardest exams.
The 3 best-performing AI assistants and their strengths
Each one's performance score out of 100 and its main strength.
Celsius ranking 2026: 5 public rankings (75%) and our experience of use (25%).
Claude excels at code, ChatGPT at the hardest problems
Each has its strength. Claude is the best at writing code, building websites and running agents, AIs that carry out a series of tasks on their own. ChatGPT is the only AI to answer more than half correctly on Humanity's Last Exam, specialist questions from every discipline chosen because AI assistants failed them: 54.8% in September 2026.
Vibe, the French AI from Mistral AI, is clearly behind: it ranks only 113th out of 419 in the users' vote. Yet it is the best European AI. Our comparison of ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini compares the models one by one.

3Which AI is the most ethical?
An AI's ethics are judged by what it agrees to produce, what it does with your data and how its developer holds its limits. On these points, Claude is the most ethical AI, with 77/100, ahead of Copilot (58) and ChatGPT (52): it refuses sexual content even in fiction and said no to the Pentagon in February 2026.
Grok comes last, at 17/100, just behind DeepSeek (18). According to the British NGO Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), it produced around 3 million sexualised images in 11 days in early 2026, and DeepSeek stores your data in China.
With 7 of the 8 major assistants, your conversations train the AI unless you opt out, and the option is switched off in the settings. Our ranking of the most ethical AI assistants details the 10 scores, and should you boycott AI? gathers the arguments of those who give it up.
Use of conversations for training, by assistant
Free and personal plans, as at 4 November 2026; business plans are generally excluded.
| Assistant | By default | Setting | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lumo | No | Never used for training | Encrypted history, unreadable by Proton |
| Euria | No | Never used for training | Ephemeral mode available |
| Claude | Your choice | Choice at sign-up, box ticked by default according to the press; can be changed in settings | 30 days without consent, 5 years with it |
| Copilot | Yes | "Model training on activity"; Europe was excluded in 2024 | 18 months |
| ChatGPT | Yes | "Improve the model for everyone" | Until deleted |
| Gemini | Yes | "Keep Activity" | 18 months; 3 years if reviewed |
| Vibe | Yes | Privacy settings | Period not published |
| Grok | Yes | "Improve the model" | Period not published |
| Perplexity | Yes | "AI data retention" | Contradictory period |
| DeepSeek | Yes | Opt-out by email only | As long as the account exists, in China |
7 of the 8 major assistants in the table train on your conversations by default: you have to switch the setting off yourself.
Sources: privacy policies and help pages of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, Mistral AI, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Proton and Infomaniak, checked on 04/11/2026.
4Which AI is the least polluting?
Not all AI assistants use the same energy to answer the same question. The gap depends less on the brand than on 2 choices made by the developer: the size of the model that answers by default, and the electricity that powers its servers.
On these 2 points, Gemini makes the best choice: it answers with a lightweight model that Google measured at 0.24 Wh (watt-hour) per query, as much as an LED bulb lit for a minute and a half. Vibe, from Mistral AI, follows closely: it answers in fast mode by default, on European servers, where electricity emits about half as much carbon as in the United States.
At the other end, Grok combines everything that weighs: unlimited video, servers partly powered by gas, and not a single published figure. Our ranking of the most polluting AI assistants details the 10 scores.
Claude scores only 47/100 on environment, even though outside estimates judge it rather economical. The reason lies with its developer: Anthropic publishes no energy figures. Without a measurement, the energy used by a query is scored at the midpoint, and Claude loses the points reserved for developers that publish. That silence is the rule, and Google remains the only developer to have measured a query under real conditions.

Our experience of use adds a caveat to this score, without being able to put a figure on it: to reach a given result, Claude goes so directly to the point that it needs fewer back-and-forths, and therefore less computation. Used for real work, it is very efficient. Anthropic points the same way for its latest large model, Opus 5.5, which it says needs less computation than its predecessor, without giving an energy figure. Claude's carbon footprint has its own article.
5Which AI should you use for what?
The scores do not tell the whole story: each AI has ground where it serves better than the others, depending on its strengths and where you come across it.
For documents and code: Claude
Claude is the assistant that comes closest to a colleague: you can hand it a whole task, from code to reviewing a report. Its large model is 1st in the users' votes on website building and agents. Its weak point is the environment, for lack of a single published figure.
For everyday life and images: ChatGPT
ChatGPT serves everyday life: a quick question, an email, an image, a search. It is the most used, with 56% of web traffic to AI sites in September 2026, and OpenAI also leads the votes on images. Its free tier lags far behind the paid one: its free model ranks only 97th out of 419 in the users' vote. The detail is in our article on the most used AI assistants.
Share of global web traffic to AI assistants, September 2026
Share of visits to the assistants' websites, phone apps not counted. The grey mark shows October 2025, and the 'Year on year' column the change in points. On the right, the number of users each developer reports.
| Assistant | Share of web traffic | Year on yearin points | Reported by the developer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ChatGPT | 56.4% | −15.4 pt | More than 1.2 billion a week (Oct. 2026) |
| 2 | Gemini | 25.0% | +11.4 pt | 1 billion a month, app (Oct. 2026) |
| 3 | Claude | 9.6% | +7.3 pt | Not published |
| 4 | DeepSeek | 3.4% | −0.7 pt | Not published |
| 5 | Grok | 2.3% | −0.5 pt | 117 million a month, including X (Mar. 2026) |
| 6 | Copilot | 1.5% | −0.5 pt | 30 million paid business licences |
| 7 | Perplexity | 0.9% | −1.6 pt | Not published |
Claude quadrupled its share in a year and Gemini almost doubled its own; ChatGPT remains far ahead. Meta AI, built into WhatsApp and Instagram, does not appear in the Similarweb data.
Sources: Similarweb, web traffic to generative AI sites (apps not counted), Oct. 2025 and Sept. 2026; OpenAI; Alphabet; SpaceX; Microsoft. Change in percentage points.
The other assistants serve narrower uses
The other 8 each have narrower ground, shaped by their scores and their uses:
- Gemini is built into Google and Android phones: it is the most frugal in the ranking, and its free version is the best placed in the users' vote, 10th out of 419.
- Perplexity suits research, since every question launches a web search and cites the pages it finds.
- Copilot serves the office, installed by default in Windows, with more than 30 million paid licences for Microsoft 365 Copilot in July 2026.
- Vibe, from Mistral AI, keeps your conversations in the European Union by default, which makes it the natural choice for sensitive data.
- DeepSeek is free and its models can be downloaded freely, but its app stores your data in China.
- Meta AI lives in WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger, and its Muse app is not available in Europe.
- Qwen, from Alibaba, remains little known, since almost no independent test covers its app.
- Grok sits one click from the X feed, but it comes last in the ranking, on ethics as on environment.
6Our verdict
The scores settle the extremes and, for the rest, leave the choice to your use.
Putting the most powerful AI first has a cost for the climate: Claude's large model uses about 20 times as much as the small one, according to CLEER, an independent database of estimates. The right setting is the small model by default, and the large one for the work that needs it.
Our 10 actions ranked by effectiveness show which setting changes the most, our article on the energy used by a ChatGPT query starts from a single question, and AI in a company's Bilan Carbone®, the French carbon accounting method, shows how to account for it.
4 rankings of AI assistants, from performance to pollution
You are hereThe Celsius ranking1st: Claude, 74/100
Last: Grok, 24/100 Most pollutingLowest impact: Gemini, 73/100
Most polluting: Grok, 13/100 Most ethical1st: Claude, 77/100
Last: Grok, 17/100 Most used1st: ChatGPT, 56.4%
Last: Perplexity, 0.9%
The Celsius ranking, final score out of 100
7Key takeaways
- Claude is the best AI of 2026 in the Celsius ranking, with 74/100, ahead of Gemini (68) and ChatGPT (60).
- The final score gives equal weight to performance, ethics and environment.
- Claude wins on performance, at 98/100, and on ethics, at 77/100, as in our ranking of the most ethical AI assistants.
- Gemini is the most frugal AI, at 73/100 on environment, and Grok has the lowest score on both ethics and environment, according to our ranking of the most polluting AI assistants.
- ChatGPT is still by far the most used, with 56% of web traffic to AI sites, according to our ranking of the most used AI assistants.
For the overall figures, see the carbon footprint of AI and all the impacts of AI, and for the so-called green alternatives, Ecosia, Euria and GreenPT put to the test.
- LMArena, Text, WebDev, Agent, Search and image leaderboards, published from 13 October to 2 November 2026, data from the official dataset updated on 3 November 2026
- Artificial Analysis, Intelligence Index, version 5.0.1, accessed on 4 November 2026
- Artificial Analysis, Gemini 4 Carbon is the new number 1, 28 October 2026
- Epoch AI, Epoch Capabilities Index and benchmark data, accessed on 4 November 2026
- Scale AI, Humanity's Last Exam, leaderboard, updated on 17 September 2026
- ARC Prize, ARC-AGI leaderboard, ARC-AGI-2 as of 28 October 2026 and ARC-AGI-3 as of 2 November 2026
- French Ministry of Culture, compar:IA, model ranking (in French), accessed on 4 November 2026
- Future of Life Institute, AI Safety Index, summer 2026, July 2026
- Stanford CRFM, Foundation Model Transparency Index, December 2025, 11 December 2025
- Google, Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google Scale, arXiv 2508.15734, 21 August 2025
- The Star, from AFP, Musk's Grok created three million sexualised images, research says, estimate by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, 23 January 2026
- Cisco, Evaluating security risk in DeepSeek and other frontier reasoning models, 31 January 2025
- Similarweb, shares of web traffic to generative AI sites, September 2026, reported by OfficeChai, 12 October 2026
- Microsoft, results of 29 July 2026, Microsoft 365 Copilot licences
- Sustainable AI Group, CLEER, technical report, 29 September 2026
- Anthropic, Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, 22 September 2026
- Projet Celsius, rankings of the most polluting, most ethical and most used AI assistants, 4 November 2026, and Celsius ranking, 5 November 2026




